Skip to content
An image of Elon Musk in a tuxedo making an odd face. The background is red with weight scales on it.
Source: theverge.com

Elon Musk to Sue Apple Over App Store Rankings, Claims Bias Toward Rival AI Apps

Sources: https://www.theverge.com/news/757941/elon-musk-xai-apple-lawsuit-app-store, theverge.com

TL;DR

  • Elon Musk’s xAI says it will take immediate legal action against Apple for allegedly manipulating App Store rankings to advantage rival AI apps. The Verge
  • Musk questioned why X and Grok are not in Apple’s “Must Have” recommendations, accusing Apple of biased practices.
  • Apple stated the App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias, using charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists based on objective criteria.
  • At the time of writing, ChatGPT tops the US iPhone app chart, with Grok ranked sixth; DeepSeek AI briefly led the App Store in January, challenging Musk’s claim.
  • The Verge also notes historic tensions between Musk, Apple, and OpenAI, including past critiques and related coverage on platform manipulation.

Context and background

The dispute centers on how Apple surfaces apps in its App Store. Musk published a series of posts on X arguing that Apple’s ranking and recommendation system works to advantage certain AI players, specifically alleging that neither X nor xAI’s Grok chatbot were placed in Apple’s Must Have lists. He claimed this constitutes antitrust behavior designed to prevent others from reaching the top spot in the App Store rankings. The Verge reports that Musk provided no evidence in these posts, and it was unclear whether he had filed a lawsuit at the time of publication. The adjacent Apple statement, reported by Bloomberg and attributed to an unnamed spokesperson, described the App Store as designed to be fair and free of bias, noting that thousands of apps are featured through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria. The wider backdrop includes a mix of past and ongoing interactions among the parties. Musk’s public profile postings on X reference a history of tension with Apple and OpenAI—organizations he has been associated with in various roles. Notably, a 2024 research study suggested that X’s algorithm had been manipulated to boost Musk’s posts, a point OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed in response to Musk’s claims by sharing a Platformer report from 2023 that similarly found Musk’s posts were promoted across X’s userbase. Earlier this year, Grok’s performance in controversies around topics like Israel and Palestine, US immigration, and abortion was also noted in coverage. The Verge highlights that this is not the first time Musk has criticized Apple or OpenAI, including prior discussions surrounding OpenAI’s pivot toward a for-profit model and past public showdowns over governance and strategy.

What’s new

  • Musk asserted on X that xAI will pursue immediate legal action against Apple for alleged manipulation of App Store rankings to favor rival AI apps. The Verge notes it was unclear whether a lawsuit had been filed at the time of reporting.
  • Apple responded, via Bloomberg-reported statements, that the App Store is fair and unbiased, with thousands of apps featured based on objective criteria. The Verge reached out for comment to both xAI and OpenAI.
  • As of the article’s publication, ChatGPT is the top free iPhone app in the US, while Grok sits at sixth; DeepSeek AI briefly reached the top in January, countering Musk’s claim.
  • The update also draws connections to prior platform and policy tensions involving Musk, Apple, OpenAI, and coverage by The Verge.

Why it matters (impact for developers/enterprises)

  • The episode highlights how app-store ranking signals, whether algorithmic or curated, influence developer visibility and user acquisition. If anti-competitive practices are perceived or proven, it could spur regulatory scrutiny and prompt changes in governance and disclosure around recommendation criteria.
  • For AI developers and platforms, visibility in app marketplaces can affect downloads, engagement, and monetization, making the integrity of ranking systems a strategic concern. Apple’s insistence on objective criteria and a bias-free approach is positioned as a core principle that developers may rely on when planning app launches and updates.
  • The broader context of past platform manipulation discussions—both on X and other social platforms—underscores how algorithmic curation and policy decisions intersect with competitive dynamics, user trust, and regulatory expectations.

Technical details or Implementation

  • Apple’s stance emphasizes that the App Store features apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists, all selected by experts using objective criteria. This framing suggests a layered approach to ranking where algorithmic signals and human curation may both play roles. The Verge notes the top rankings at the time of writing, including ChatGPT as the leading free iPhone app in the US and Grok in the sixth position, with DeepSeek AI briefly preceding ChatGPT in January.
  • The discussion references historical observations about platform manipulation in other contexts, including X’s adjustments to its own feed and prior research that examined how amplification algorithms can influence visibility. While those points are part of the broader narrative, the current reporting emphasizes Musk’s assertions about Apple’s handling of app recommendations rather than independent verification of the ranking algorithm.

Key takeaways

  • Elon Musk’s xAI claims it will sue Apple over alleged App Store ranking manipulation intended to favor rival AI apps.
  • Apple contends the App Store is fair and unbiased, using objective criteria across charts, algorithmic recommendations, and expert-curated lists.
  • The current ranking snapshot shows ChatGPT as the top free iPhone app in the US, Grok at sixth, and DeepSeek briefly leading the store in January.
  • The Verge highlights the ongoing pattern of public disagreements involving Musk, Apple, and OpenAI, including prior observations of platform-level manipulation in related contexts.
  • No conclusive evidence has been presented in Musk’s posts according to the reporting at the time of publication, and the status of any lawsuit remained unclear.

FAQ

  • What is Musk claiming about Apple’s App Store rankings?

    He argues Apple manipulated rankings to disadvantage X and Grok in favor of rival AI apps, and suggested antitrust violations.

  • Has the lawsuit been filed?

    The Verge reports that Musk claimed he would file and take immediate action, but it was unclear whether a suit had actually been filed at the time of reporting.

  • How does Apple describe its App Store ranking process?

    Apple says the App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias, featuring thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria.

  • What are the current top App Store rankings cited in the coverage?

    ChatGPT is the top free iPhone app in the US, Grok is sixth, and DeepSeek AI briefly topped ChatGPT in January.

  • What broader context does this fit into?

    The episode is part of a longer history of public disagreements among Musk, Apple, and OpenAI, and it intersects with discussions about platform manipulation and algorithmic visibility.

References

More news